Casting Them Out

Under Modi, Hindutva provides sanction for crimes against humanity

Irshad Khan, 24, holds a picture of his late father Pehlu, 55, on 2 June 2017. Irshad survived an attack by cow vigilantes when transporting cattle, which left his father dead and friends badly beaten. Cathal McNaughton / REUTERS
20 August, 2023

THE GENETICS OF INDIA note a remarkable singularity. In the millennium following the arrival of the people from the Eurasian Steppe, around three to four thousand years ago, the Indian population went through a remarkable churning. Almost every Indian today has an admixture of a varying proportion of genes drawn from the steppe people and the existing Indus Valley population. And then, somewhere after a thousand years of intermixing, the churn that produced all of us, froze over.

According to the geneticist David Reich, the result is that, although India has a huge population, it is essentially a large collection of small groups. “The degree of genetic differentiation among Indian jati groups living side by side in the same village is typically two to three times higher than the genetic differentiation between northern and southern Europeans,” Reich notes in an essay. “There are few, if any, Indian groups that are demographically very large.” In contrast, he writes, “The Han Chinese are truly a large population. They have been mixing freely for thousands of years.”

Endogamous groups, separated from each other, are what we call jatis today. They are sorted into the larger categorisation of varna, which is hierarchical. The origins of this hierarchy of jatis must date back to somewhere when the period of intermixing came to an end, or shortly after. “The jati system,” Reich states, “involves a minimum of 4,600 and by some accounts around 40,000 endogamous groups. Each is assigned a particular rank in the varna system, but strong and complicated endogamy rules prevent people from most different jatis from mixing with each other, even if they are of the same varna level.”

It is difficult today to ascertain how those relegated to demeaning positions in the hierarchy were so confined. No group was going to accept such a situation willingly. It would have required theological justification and the use of preponderant force to the point where communities felt unable to challenge their subjugation by those who have created the label of “upper caste” for themselves. While any such claim is hypothetical, difficult to verify or obtain evidence for, we now have an instance before us where a similar process is ongoing and has achieved the kind of malevolent success no one could have predicted even a decade ago: the degradation and marginalisation of the Muslims of India under Prime Minister Narendra Modi.