A Glimpse Into the Lives of People that the Highly-Contested Land Acquisition Bill Will Affect

{
  "type": "gallery",
  "content": [
    {
      "type": "figure",
      "attrs": {
        "h": 667,
        "w": 1000,
        "id": "6372",
        "src": "//lh3.googleusercontent.com/krbS_Yz9vzxy9h7muie64qxu-MI1hCZMl0vQItf79BWLb1fo2A-K4dvi2zH9VDwUrv8HjAF_nAin0fPXF4vhI0NPfQ=s0"
      },
      "content": [
        {
          "type": "caption",
          "content": [
            {
              "text": "A Kharia adivasi farmer sows seeds for a new crop in Sundergarh,Odisha. In the background, a railway line is being constructed that will cut through his lands, connecting the industrial district of Jharsuguda to the village of Serdega where public sector coal mines are located. Land acquisition for the line takes place under the Indian Railways Act, which is exempt from the consent and social impact assessment provisions of the Land  Acquisition Act. This picture was taken in September 2014.",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "type": "credit",
          "content": [
            {
              "text": "Aruna Chandrasekhar",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "figure",
      "attrs": {
        "h": 1000,
        "w": 667,
        "id": "6374",
        "src": "//lh3.googleusercontent.com/YIii8mOktDbn-PhJg3Le61420lsNx1WayDTE4PqD8lET_VDqdRNi7aogmH2gD9ZEDqbTR6klnaX9Q93X5EvbbLLk=s0"
      },
      "content": [
        {
          "type": "caption",
          "content": [
            {
              "text": "Soon after the monsoon, a Binjhwar adivasi woman collects reeds from the streams near the railway line to make into brooms. Linear projects such as railways, while essential, cut across large tracts of land, affecting communities on either side. There have been moves by the government to remove the requirement of indigenous village assembly consent for the use of forest land for industry, mandatory under the Forest Rights Act. Sundergarh is a constitutionally-protected indigenous district and the home constituency of Minister of Tribal Affairs, Jual Oram.",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "type": "credit",
          "content": [
            {
              "text": "Aruna Chandrasekhar",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "figure",
      "attrs": {
        "h": 750,
        "w": 1000,
        "id": "2458",
        "src": "//lh3.googleusercontent.com/kvGNdNs_T0PBUi56N2986sZPRELd1RpRXpHgxC5dMiQ3QcfC-pXiDWk8P85Qr-xhvuh7G7t8AOyg5TyZ3PKtDjXpMw=s0"
      },
      "content": [
        {
          "type": "caption",
          "content": [
            {
              "text": "Dongria Kondh adivasis pay their tributes to Niyamraja, their god of universal law, atop the Niyam Dongar hill in Kalahandi, Odisha. Vedanta Resources, a mining company based in the United Kingdom, had plans to mine bauxite from this very hill, which were vetoed by 12 indigenous village councils near the mine as it would affect their cultural and religious rights. This picture was taken in April 2011.",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "type": "credit",
          "content": [
            {
              "text": "Aruna Chandrasekhar",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "figure",
      "attrs": {
        "h": 714,
        "w": 1000,
        "id": "6375",
        "src": "//lh3.googleusercontent.com/MY4V5Bcs7Du-nOdmRpNXbIo5LmkGcemb5aiS_wu-QB6Ypk6AvrMbCqz-yQrUGzfuVnLI1iPIvxPF86OA7hlJNIBoIQ=s0"
      },
      "content": [
        {
          "type": "caption",
          "content": [
            {
              "text": "Unlike the social impact assessment envisioned under the Land Act, current environmental impact assessments do not provide details either on vulnerable tribal groups or on sites of cultural and religious importance. They are carried out by third parties hired by companies, with little incentive to portray accurate ground realities. Plans to expand an alumina refinery at the base of these hills continue to progress.",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "type": "credit",
          "content": [
            {
              "text": "Aruna Chandrasekhar",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

On 12 May 2015, the Lok Sabha referred the controversial land acquisition bill to a Joint Committee of Parliament, amidst mounting resistance from the Opposition and some of its allies. A thirty-member joint committee of the Parliament, which will comprise twenty members of Parliament from the Lok Sabha and ten from the Rajya Sabha, will submit a report of its findings on the first day of the Monsoon Session of the Parliament. The bill, which seeks to make the process of acquiring land for industry and infrastructure easier, has been critcised for diluting the need for consent from those whose land would be acquired. While the Bhartiya Janata Party has been refuting all claims that the bill is “anti-farmer”, the unrest caused by the bill has only been increasing.

Through this photo essay, Aruna Chandrasekhar of Amnesty International shares glimpses of land acquisition and social conflict from across a diverse series of projects, geographies and communities that could potentially be at risk from a bill, that many believe threatens to diminish their rights.